|
QUESTIONNAIRE PERCEPTIONS OF THE LEVEL OF IMPORTANCE OF DIRECT AGENTS OF DEFORESTATION AT THE LOCAL LEVEL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS IN HONDURAS |
||||||||||
|
FACTORS CONSIDERED DIRECT AGENTS |
NOT VERY IMPORTANT |
IMPORTANT |
VERY IMPORTANT |
|||||||
|
1. THE EXPANSION OF THE AGRICULTURAL FRONTIER |
0 |
3 |
17 |
|||||||
|
2. THE EXPANSION OF THE CATTLE RANCHING FRONTIER |
1 |
9 |
10 |
|||||||
|
3. THE LEVELS OF NATIONAL INCOME |
3 |
11 |
5 |
|||||||
|
4. THE CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS AND RAILROAD TRACKS |
10 |
8 |
1 |
|||||||
|
5. THE EXPORTS OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS |
15 |
3 |
1 |
|||||||
|
6. THE EXPORTS OF LIVESTOCK PRODUCTS |
10 |
8 |
1 |
|||||||
|
7. THE EXTERNAL DEBT |
14 |
2 |
4 |
|||||||
|
8. PRODUCTION/CONSUMPTION OF ROUNDWOOD |
4 |
10 |
5 |
|||||||
|
9. PRODUCTION/CONSUMPTION OF FUELWOOD AND CHARCOAL |
1 |
4 |
14 |
|||||||
|
10. PRODUCTION/CONSUMPTION OF INDUSTRIAL RAOUNWOOD |
5 |
14 |
0 |
|||||||
|
11. POPULATION LEVELS |
3 |
13 |
4 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
QUESTIONNAIRE PERCEPTIONS OF THE LEVEL OF IMPORTANCE OF DIRECT AGENTS OF DEFORESTATION AT THE LOCAL LEVEL NON-GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS IN HONDURAS |
||||||||||
|
FACTORS CONSIDERED DIRECT AGENTS |
NOT VERY IMPORTANT |
IMPORTANT |
VERY IMPORTANT |
|||||||
|
1. THE EXPANSION OF THE AGRICULTURAL FRONTIER |
0 |
3 |
8 |
|||||||
|
2. THE EXPANSION OF THE CATTLE RANCHING FRONTIER |
0 |
7 |
4 |
|||||||
|
3. THE LEVELS OF NATIONAL INCOME |
5 |
2 |
2 |
|||||||
|
4. THE CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS AND RAILROAD TRACKS |
5 |
4 |
2 |
|||||||
|
5. THE EXPORTS OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS |
5 |
3 |
3 |
|||||||
|
6. THE EXPORTS OF LIVESTOCK PRODUCTS |
6 |
5 |
0 |
|||||||
|
7. THE EXTERNAL DEBT |
6 |
3 |
2 |
|||||||
|
8. PRODUCTION/CONSUMPTION OF ROUNDWOOD |
1 |
5 |
5 |
|||||||
|
9. PRODUCTION/CONSUMPTION OF FUELWOOD AND CHARCOAL |
2 |
3 |
6 |
|||||||
|
10. PRODUCTION/CONSUMPTION OF INDUSTRIAL RAOUNWOOD |
1 |
4 |
6 |
|||||||
|
11. POPULATION LEVELS |
2 |
7 |
2 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
QUESTIONNAIRE PERCEPTIONS OF THE LEVEL OF IMPORTANCE OF DIRECT AGENTS OF DEFORESTATION AT THE LOCAL LEVEL GOVERNMENT AND NON-GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS IN HONDURAS |
||||||||||
|
FACTORS CONSIDERED DIRECT AGENTS |
NOT VERY IMPORTANT |
IMPORTANT |
VERY IMPORTANT |
|||||||
|
1. THE EXPANSION OF THE AGRICULTURAL FRONTIER |
0 |
6 |
25 |
|||||||
|
2. THE EXPANSION OF THE CATTLE RANCHING FRONTIER |
1 |
16 |
14 |
|||||||
|
3. THE LEVELS OF NATIONAL INCOME |
8 |
13 |
7 |
|||||||
|
4. THE CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS AND RAILROAD TRACKS |
15 |
12 |
3 |
|||||||
|
5. THE EXPORTS OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS |
20 |
6 |
4 |
|||||||
|
6. THE EXPORTS OF LIVESTOCK PRODUCTS |
16 |
13 |
1 |
|||||||
|
7. THE EXTERNAL DEBT |
20 |
5 |
6 |
|||||||
|
8. PRODUCTION/CONSUMPTION OF ROUNDWOOD |
5 |
15 |
10 |
|||||||
|
9. PRODUCTION/CONSUMPTION OF FUELWOOD AND CHARCOAL |
3 |
7 |
20 |
|||||||
|
10. PRODUCTION/CONSUMPTION OF INDUSTRIAL RAOUNWOOD |
6 |
18 |
6 |
|||||||
|
11. POPULATION LEVELS |
5 |
20 |
6 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Go Back to the Deforestation Perceptions Page